Recent Comments

    UNITED WORLD CITIZENS

    Why we need WORLD CITIZENS UNITED. see also http://civismundi.net

    I would imagine that it was fairly easy to form the organization we call the United Nations. One national leader suggested the concept to another and the idea escalated until all 190 plus nations were together under one roof trying to find ways to keep some semblance of peace on the planet. This is all well and good but what happens when the planet’s seas, fresh water, atmosphere, soil, biodiversity etc. are so badly degraded and poisoned that all life is threatened and diminished? On top of this we have rapid breakdowns of human rights, diminishing democracies, the increasing concentration of media and information, population problems, nuclear concerns, genetically modified organism concerns, and a plague of plastic turning the oceans into a toxic soup. In this dire and ever-expanding situation the people desperately have formed literally millions of NGOs and countless activist groups in pretty much every community on earth as they to try to persuade our elected political representatives to please do something.

    While we frantically organize and chaotically struggle for corrective action, we are hassled, hampered and patronized by moneyed market forces which have a strong interaction and collaboration with politicians and political parties, not to mention despotic leaders in non-democratic countries. (Where they trample on human rights, steal resources, expropriate the people’s commons and ignore environmental laws and practices.)

    We socially and environmentally minded individuals and groups are completely fragmented and disorganized beyond all belief; consequently and regrettably we have little hope of effectively impacting on any of the disasters facing us unless we somehow find a new innovative way to make a significant number of our diverse and scattered world’s citizens collectively more influential and forceful. We have the will but we have yet to find ‘the way’. It is imperative that the meek become empowered once and for all. It as if we are knocking on closed and locked doors trying to be heard all at the same time. We are ignored while our political representatives and corporate power are inside forging our destiny without any significant input from us.

    This dire situation could be much improved if we could just get ourselves established into a powerful enough cooperative worldwide organization with a shared universal mission.

    The first question we need to ask is “must we do something?” To this I think it is obvious. Is it worthwhile? Again, I think it is obvious. Is success attainable? I think that it really is, providing we put the power of united world citizens both before and behind corrective initiatives and bypass the naysayers.

    NGOs would still operate their organisations independent of any new org. They could collaborate if they wish, and together sort the issues and put them in order. They would be free to independently offer advice to legislations when it became apparent that the people are demanding action and that their expertise is needed to implement such action.

    If the United Nations was seen as the hope for peace then why do we not see the need for a similar group; possibly called United World Citizens or something similar; as a means to correcting pressing social and environmental issues?

    Let’s assume for a moment that we could somehow bring all of the problems to one place. What would we need to do?

    IDENTIFY THE PROBLEMS

    Collect and write out all of the problems that need addressing so that the depth of the overall situation is clear to one and all. I can guarantee you that there are more active NGOs then there are problems, and that there are many problems that have no defenders or representatives whatsoever.

    CATEGORIZE THE PROBLEMS

    Next we need to put the problems (separate issues) into categories. I am going to suggest that there are be no more than 26 categories for reasons that will be apparent later. (This is not an absolute priority)

    PRIORITIZE THE PROBLEMS

    Prioritize the issues within each category and put them into a 25 year plan. Don’t worry, as the priorities can be changed and rearranged as data comes in and membership grows.

    CHOOSE THE FIRST ISSUES

    It may be best to put something relatively simple at the top of the list rather than the most ominous issue/problem, remembering that it will take time for this new organization to gather significant worldwide member support. (I will put examples for a single category at the end just to show how this would work)

    Simple mathematics will now show that we have 26 X 25 issues to put to the membership for their personal input and consideration – the total equals 650 separate issues spaced over 25 years. (a good start)

    USE EXISTING INFORMATION

    NGO’s and other groups have a lot of information in their data bases with which we can make informed decisions. These groups will be important to the new organization and movement as they can help with identifying and prioritizing and establishing the first issue that will be put forward.

    PUT THE CATEGORIES INTO A REPEATING ORDER

    Take the 26 or so categories and put them into a sequence so that they can be presented to the membership for input and consideration one at a time. If we use 26 categories, and allow a two week period between publication and email distribution of a new petition to the membership, we can address an issue in each and every category in each year of the plan. (This is not absolutely essential)

    ESTABLISH A SET TIME FRAME

    It is important that the membership is not overwhelmed with action requests too frequently. A minimum of a 14 day interval is suggested as this allows time to research, ponder and sign. Also, governments receiving such petitions will not be overwhelmed on a daily basis from multiple sources.

    PUT THE WORLD ON NOTICE

    Remember that we must visualize the whole world and all the people as one community with all problems affecting all its citizens’ welfare. Once the categories and issues have been established, the whole world including business leaders and politicians everywhere on the planet, will be put on notice that we are determined to press for changes now and in the foreseeable future, or until the job is done. Anyone, anywhere, will be able to see for themselves what is in the proverbial “pipeline” and slatted for corrective action.

    SEND E-PETITION TO THE LEADERS OF EVERY NATION

    Email the petition to every member for consideration and signing. If the member agrees with the suggested petition’s objectives then it is signed and the totals tabulated. After a designated time frame the signed e-petition is sent to every political legislative power in each and every country.

    WHY CATEGORIES?

    I personally have a great desire to see reductions in the unrestrained use of PLASTIC for reasons I will make clear below. Alternatively hormone-mimicking chemicals in products create a host of problems beyond the scope of this paper. I also have concern for FOOD safety. In the category of HUMAN RIGHTS I would like to see a worldwide ban on female genital mutilation. Therefore, I would enthusiastically subscribe to the categories of PLASTIC, TOXINS, FOOD and HUMAN RIGHTS. With these choices I would then be asked to participate and consider only 4 petitions per year. If I choose to support others in their causes, I could then simply change my settings to include or perhaps exclude categories at any time. Someone who hates the phony governments produced by plurality/majority voting might sign up for DEMOCRACY/VOTING as they push for proportional representative voting. The same person may dislike nuclear power plants and add NUCLEAR ISSUES to his or her list. Another might prefer WATER RESOURCES and LAND/SOIL LOSS DEGRADATION as they push for natural burial of the human body to prevent formaldehyde from leeching into ground water. Another might choose POPULATION CONCERNS as it gets little attention from anyone. Eventually all categories would have their champions.

    SET CRITERIA FOR PETITIONS

    Most groups that currently use e-petitions are reacting to human rights violations within single nations. Other petitions may be to protect a species like a butterfly (always the Monarch) or bees and other pollinators. (Category SPECIES) Our petitions however must meet more stringent criteria. I suggest that the following two questions be asked before an issue is put to the members.

    Does this action benefit the welfare of the planet? Does this action undo or prevent an injustice against all humankind?

    DEVELOP MULTI LANGUAGE CAPABILITIES

    As this is a global effort we need to have multi-language capabilities just like the UN. As the movement grows, volunteers would provide translation services.

    AVOID POLITICAL AND MARKET FORCES

    The UN is awash with political intrigue and corporate pressures. Powerful nations exert their will on the less powerful and use money, pressure and veto power to get their own way. This new organization must avoid such outside influence and stick with the concept of one member, one vote. Every citizen on the planet can participate if they have access to social media.

    STEAL GOOD IDEAS FROM OTHERS

    AVAAZ and others use e-petitions quite effectively. They also have a good record for gathering members to the cause. They have an enviable 42,000,000 members at last count. Unlike AVAAZ we would cover all 26 categories and e-petition all 190 plus nations whereas they cover only a few categories and e-petition single legislations or corporations.

    EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS MIGHT WORK

    As an example of how this might work, let’s assume that in step one we decided that PLASTIC was a distinct and separate category that needed to be addressed. If you watched a recent documentary regarded the pollution of the oceans with plastic you might agree that this would be a suitable and essential category. The program suggested that the problem lies in the world’s recycling and waste management programs. This is a grave error in judgment as plastic and the manufacturing in plastic is the problem itself. It is a problem so harmful that it potentially threatens all that exists.

    Can we eliminate all manufacturing in plastic? – Not realistically or likely! Can we eliminate manufacturing of drinking straws from plastic? Why not? Using straws made of waxed paper would not diminish my lifestyle at all, but it would be a small step for correcting earth’s ecosystem. So we make it an issue for inclusion and our collective attention somewhere in the 25 year plan.

    Using the above logic, after demanding “No manufacturing of plastic straws” we could combine several related issues and demand “No manufacturing of plastic net bags for citrus, onion and garlic.” Manufacturers and suppliers could revert back to twisted paper code bags. Sure, some manufacturers will cry foul but that is unfortunate. We survived the problems they created when they destroyed our shoe industry, our appliance industry, our textile industry, our ship building industry etc. They will adjust just as they forced us to adjust.

    Next might come “No excess plastic may be used as fillers in packaging of food products.” My life style would not be diminished.

    As we progress we might demand “No manufacturing of toys in plastic”. Kids would still have toys to play with, as manufacturers look to alternative material. Life would not be diminished what-so-ever.

    Let’s try attempting something that might be more contentious. “No packaging of toothpaste in plastic tubes” I’m not sure that this could ever be accomplished but really, if my tooth paste came in powder form in a little tinned or cardboard container I’m sure I could cope. Also, billions of empty non-biodegradable tubes would be essentially removed from the ecosystem each and every year, forever and ever. (Imagine the number of albatross that might survive because there were billions fewer plastic caps to feed (and kill) their fledgling offspring)

    Here are a few more to consider. (You are welcome to offer more.) “No plastic in razor manufacturing”, “No plastic coat hangers”, “No plastic stickers on fruit and vegetables”, “No plastic inserts in bottles”, “No plastic to be used in olive oil containers” “No injection molded chairs” etc. Again my life style would not be diminished.

    We eventually get to harder and harder issues. It we look to the problem with manmade fibers we will find a singularly horrendous problem. All clothing and carpets break down and shed fibers. Millions of tons of these fibers are washed into the oceans where they become part of the food chain that reaches ever upwards. This ocean of toxic soup is a crisis that can be reduced because we know what is causing it. We have about 35 natural plant and animal fibers that can be used as replacements to synthetics. We just need to accept the obvious and make some dramatic changes.

    In this exercise, I have addressed only one category of problems and only a few issues within said category. NGOs, individuals and other groups could put together a much more comprehensive list.

    How can we accomplish this goal? I’m not sure but it will start by suggesting the concept here. What do you think of setting up WORLD CITIZENS UNITED to tackle social and environmental issues?

    Sincerely Matthew R Foster (civis mundi sum)

    MIDWAY – a film by Chris Jordon

    a film by chris jordon

    “A PEOPLE’S COURSE OF ACTION”

    This site is being maintained to direct visitors to http://civismundi.net It has a better defined mission. Thanks for stopping.

    Subject – “A PEOPLE’S COURSE OF ACTION” conference/symposium

    The problems that face the people and planet are horrendous and yet we seem unable to frame a practical plan that we could use to address the challenge united and internationally.

    It is obvious that our current political systems, institutions and corporations have failed us and that we collectively need to take a decidedly different course of action if we hope to stem devastating global collapse of ecosystems and societies. The only other course of action is “the power of people”.

    In an effort to evaluate some ideas and stimulate an initial constructive debate among a number of concerned individuals, my wife and I are prepared to help finance such a preliminary meeting. We will pay up to “undisclosed” dollars to bring together such a conference, (meeting? symposium?) to fruition – the objective of which would be the creating of a basis for a practical approach to resolving this global challenge, before we are too late.

    Here are some of the things that might be debated and resolved in such a gathering. (please feel free to offer your ideas)

    • Let it be resolved that the people of the planet are willing, or not willing, to act decisively to save the planet and to improve the welfare of all who dwell everywhere on the planet.
    • Let it be resolved that “we within this generation” are the last generation that can be effective at identifying, prioritizing, promoting and demanding solutions.
    • Let it be resolved that we indeed have enough knowledge within the database of existing orgs, NGOs and other groups with which to collectively make informed decisions.
    • Let it be resolved that our political systems and institutions have failed us and that we need to find a decidedly new course of action where all initiative and corrective action comes through the will of the people.
    • Let it be resolved that the time has passed for writing about it, reading about it and talking about it and time to collectively do something real and tangible.
    • Let it be resolved that we are presently fragmented and ineffective in resolving today’s appalling problems in a timely manner.
    • Let it be resolved that we are ineffective at preparing, presenting and garnering wide support for issues.
    • Let it be resolved that social media in its present form could be, or could not be, effective in gathering public input and opinion, and for presenting petitions for public acceptance.
    • Let it be resolved that a new worldwide social media site dedicated solely to the issues of resolving social problems and addressing the environmental concerns is possible, practical and essential.
    • Let it be resolved that we have the worldwide talent and capability of having a site presented and maintained in all necessary languages.
    • Let it be resolved that all of our worldwide problems and concerns can be categorized and entered into a single manageable format.
    • Let it be resolved that the following are, or are not, suitable categories — Air Quality, Democracy/Voting, Drugs, Energy, Farming/Forestry, Fishing/Whaling, Food, Genetic Engineering, Health, Human Rights, Land/Soil, Mining, Non-personages, Nuclear Issues, People’s Commons/natural resources, Plastic Dangers, Population, Public Broadcasting/Freedom of speech/Right to Knowledge, Species, Toxins, Trade and Labor, Transportation, Waste/ Recycle, Water Resources, Uncategorized. (See http://stopstopstop.org  )
    • Let it be resolved that issues within each category could be, and should be, prioritized by debate and consensus.
    • Let it be resolved that every category shall have equal weight within the final plan.
    • Let it be resolved that each and every category shall present one petition for review and public support in each and every country on the planet at the same time each and every year (at least once).
    • Let it be resolved that submitting a publically endorsed and signed petition/plebiscite to all legislative bodies worldwide is, or is not, possible or practical.
    • Let it be resolved that an environmental problem in one country is a problem for all of us worldwide.
    • Let it be resolved that we need to act with one voice and under one easily recognizable worldwide banner with one worldwide mission and not become further fragmented in this planning process.
    • Let it be resolved that we need to act now, as time is our unforgiving enemy.

    Sincerely,

     

    Matthew Foster

    Getting Our Act Together

    GETTING OUR ACT TOGETHER

    If I were to suggest that we need another environmental/humanitarian organization I would reasonably expect a few frowns and groans.” Egad!!! – There are already several million NGOs in the world, (according to Wikipedia) untold activist groups and web sites already; why in heavens name would we need another one”. Bear with me please, and let me see if I can make a good case for having just one more.

    Untold people in most every nation develop web sites, join organizations, join NGOs, form activist groups, attend meetings, knock on doors, volunteer, join political parties, donate money, sign petitions, write to their newspapers, attend rallies etc. – all in the hope of making some minor difference in correcting perceived social ills and injustices. The effort expended is formidable but it has remarkable little effect on the targeted welfare of people and planet. It has remarkably little effect because we are so fragmented and disorganized. We should really consider coming together worldwide into, and under, one all-encompassing big circus sized tent. What we need is not another web site and organization struggling and competing for attention so much as we need “reorganization” and “consolidation of effort” – An “umbrella group” that brings us together so that we can be a large force for justice and significant enough to be heard above the din of misleading and confusing hype.

    Collectively we join and finance millions of groups. We in effect hire them to work on our behalf; work that we have neither the time nor talent to do. Corporations and business people also join and finance groups to work on their behalf. We call these groups right winged policy institutes; commonly called think tanks. They do their research and write up material that becomes proposed acts/decrees/law of the land. They then lobby the people’s representatives in our various representative governments to enact such acts – often in the form of enormous omnibus bills which run for hundreds of pages and include multiple acts which are in direct conflict with the interests of both the people and the planet.
    Simply put – We need to do the same as the right-winged policy institutes. If we want our causes to be proposed, researched, written up, presented to politicians and then lobbied, we need to change our approach to match the tactics of the opposition with their combined and extremely harmful self-serving interests. Whereas the incorporated world has money to promote their vested interests we have millions, if not billions of people to move our interests forward. First however we need to assemble and unite them in a mission like no other before. To delay is to miss the only opportunity we will ever have to make a difference, as time, above all things, is our immediate and unrelenting enemy.

    Together worldwide, we have the research; we have the knowledge; we have the talents, but we are as a million voices all trying to be heard; all at the same time. If we could simply get our separate concerns written up and presented in a logical, orderly and consistent format with each of us supporting the other in our endeavours, we might better be heard and listened to. We need to systematically present our case for the changes that are the essential keys to the very health of the planet and the welfare of people worldwide.

    The difficulties we have with the wellbeing of the planet are global and transcend all borders. Resolving a problem in a single city, state or nation is of vital importance, however getting everyone involved and active in every nation to a single objective should be the essential and ultimate goal.

    No man or country is exempt from the offenses we create with our combined and separate activities whether they are from our past or ongoing actions and abuses. The problems we face are worldwide problems. An assault on the ecosystem in one country is an assault on the planet. An assault on the health and welfare of people in one country is something we all need to consider if we truly believe in universal justice.

    In support of a new web site where we might conceivably organize and display our proposed worldwide legislative acts consider the following –

    • Let’s suppose that we had a worldwide web site that exhibited our proposed legislative acts but neither prepared them or promoted them directly.
    • Let’s suppose that we simply called on the existing and established groups of individuals or activist groups to prepare the proposed legislative acts clause by clause by clause by clause.
    • Let’s suppose that these proposals were all written in a format that is consistence and easy to understand throughout the site.
    • Let’s suppose that these proposed legislative acts were categorized and numbered to help readers searching for proposals.  (Suggested list to follow)
    • Let’s suppose that as the movement grew the site would offer translation of the proposed acts into multiple languages so that all can participate in the venture.
    • Let’s suppose that the proposed legislative acts were entered under one of (possibly) 26 categories so that one could be systematically and consistently presented each second week of the year. When one year was past the process would start over with a new proposed act under the same category as in the same month in the previous year.
    • Let’s suppose that the existing NGOs and groups that we already finance were our personal progressive “Think Tanks”. If anyone wanted to be part of the process, they would prepare the individual clauses that would make up a proposed piece of legislation that would in turn address the issue in question. They would supply relevant information from their research data and ask their collective members to put their combined influence behind this crucial worldwide proposal and movement.
    • Let’s suppose that petition-sponsoring groups like Avaaz were asked to take up the task of being the lobby groups. They would send out a petition as scheduled but not to a single legislative body in one country but to all of the legislative bodies in all countries. (it is recognised that this would be a significant, but essential, task to compile without the help of individuals in each country)
    • Let’s suppose that we use a single data base for all supporters and possibly a registry where all could show their commitment by adding their name or nickname.
    • To have a single movement we need a single mission and a single mission statement. For want of something better, how about “ Proposing, Preparing, Presenting and Promoting Legislative Acts Worldwide for Planet and People”
    • To have a movement that is recognized it will need a name that suggests precisely what the objective is. To this I suggest something like “ACT” as it suggests both action and a decree/law. ACT can be expanded into act-as-one, act now, act up, act out, activist, and action. I’m sure we could come up with a good and appropriate acronym for three letters as well. (like AD CURAM TERRAE for instance – in the service of earth)
    • Let’s suppose that a distinctive banner or ribbon would be appropriate to make everyone visible to one another and to show our solidarity. To this I suggest we could use material in the distinctive color of Terra Cotta which appropriately translates as Burnt Earth.

    Saving the world from ourselves is not going to come about without disruption to our way of life, however if our continuing way of life is destructive to our existence, our welfare, and the future then there is no other option available to us except to shirk responsibility . That is not to say that any proposed legislative act cannot have a timetable for implementation that gives a measured but limited time to adapt.

    Many years ago I worked in a factory that made electric tea kettles. The government banned the use of lead solder in the manufacture of this product as it leached lead into the boiling water and created a health hazard. The change to tin solder was not without problems, and economic hardship for the company, but it was essential to protect the health and welfare of the public. All of the acts which would be proposed would have the same objectives. IE – To protect the health and welfare of people and planet.

    The initial proposed legislative acts should be tame enough to gain approval from both the public and the politicians while the movement grows. Once it is understood that the objectives are just and essential the goals would be ramped up. If nothing else our work could be a great policy resource for perspective parties and politicians everywhere on the planet.

    This project needs debate and input to refine the concept. I have little talent for this venture and would like to see someone else take up this challenge.

    Sincerely,
    Matt Foster world@golden.net 519 621 9908

    The categories might be as follows (Note – I suggest 26 categories but it might just as easily be 30 or 40. The 26 fits into a year nicely but repeating any number of categories will work. The important thing is that it is seen as being organized, all-inclusive and repetitive so that everyone will know when their issue will come up for inclusion. Although this process need never end, the first ten years will be crucial.

    1. Air degradation air travel pollution, tourism travel pollution, space exploration pollution, private space tourism, Carbon dioxide levels, Methane, Chlorofluorocarbons, low altitude ozone O3, smog and vapor, incineration of hazardous wastes, smoke, changing weather      patterns, ozone depletion, ultraviolet radiation,
    2. Democracy/Voting Threatened democracy, undemocratic electoral systems, foreign interference in domestic government, private armies, separation of religion and state, voting machine fraud, Geo-engineering of the planet,
    3. Drugs effects on environment, disposal of, post toilet effects, resistance to degradation,
    4. Energy - Energy conservation,  Efficient energy use, Renewable energy      commercialization, Coal industry , Oil sands energy, coal power generation, renewable energy, bio-fuel, offshore power generation, bio-fuel and biomass, excess home and institutional heating and cooling, wasteful motorized toys (aircraft, overpower boats,  snowmobiles, seadoes etc.), oversized private automobiles,
    5. Farming/Forestry factory farms, clear cutting, irrigation, illegal crops, rain forests, reforestation, clear-cutting, land restoration, habitat destruction,
    6. Fishing/Whaling blast fishing, cyanide fishing, dragnet fishing, seabed destruction, illegal fishing, fish farming, (ghost fishing) lost fishing nets, blast fishing, research whaling,
    7. Food world hunger/starvation, labeling of food, artificial sweeteners, food additives, fair trade produce, pesticide residue in food, excess chemicals in food, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, palm oil, local produce, low cost producers,
    8. Genetic engineering unnatural/natural, promotion of herbicide use, irreversible consequences, removes seeds from commons, unforeseen consequences, presides use with as added hazards, may create super weeds, nutrition claims, allergenic realities, toxicity, who pays cost of problems created, week regulations, right to know what one is eating, violate dietary and religious restrictions, organic industry threat to, accidental contamination of neighboring fields, threat to human and animal genome,
    9. Health health-care as a right, birth defect rise, traditional health product, vaccine contamination, international obesity, drug resistant diseases, UV tanning beds, Cell phone radiation, resistance to antibiotics, weakened genome, Bovine Somatatropn (BST, cancer research, novel pathogens, incurable strains of tuberculosis, pneumonia, dysentery,      cholera,  legionnaire’s disease, malaria, compromised immune and hormonal systems, drug resistant STDs, indoor pollution, formaldehyde in household products.
    10. Human Rights Women’s rights, genital mutilation, child poverty, social inequality, child soldiers, torture, extraordinary rendition, rising sea water/displaced people, natural disaster planning and relief, indoor pollution air standards, practice of leblouh/forced      feeding of young girls, private prison industry, refugees and undocumented/illegal immigrants, slavery, citizenship, equality, right of association,
    11. Land/Soil Degradation soil erosion, landfills, disappearing beaches, expanding cities, desertification, drought, habitat loss, paving the best farm land, human burial concerns,
    12. Mining arsenic leach mining, reforestation, sink holes and surface elevation changes, ground water contamination, tailings, tailing dams, noise, dust, visual pollution, mercury runoff, sulfuric acid runoff, excess use of water resource, heavy metal contamination and      runoff, habitat loss,
    13. Non-personages maximum wages controls vs minimum wage controls, problems with corporate personhood, military/industrial complex influences, undermining UN effectiveness, UN Veto abuse, IMF, World Bank, masquerading greens, special interest lobby groups, special interest think tanks, limits to advertising propaganda, lobby groups, political parties, religious group propaganda, secret societies, deindustrialization of      nations, hiding profits in offshore accounts.
    14. Nuclear Issues irradiation of produce, 30,000 nuclear warheads, nuclear proliferation, nuclear power generation, materials storage, accidental losses,
    15. People’s Commons/natural resources right of way, wilderness sell-off, rare raw resources, foreign ownership of resources,
    16. Plastic Dangers Excess packaging, single use plastic, plastic chemical leaching, plastic bag problem, Teflon concerns, food container chemical leaching, high levels of BPA in urine, measurable levels of phthalates in humans, effect on reproduction, reproduction abnormalities, floating plastic waste as transport for invasive species, mass of floating debris, ingested by wildlife, chokes wildlife, longevity of waste, kills over and over again,      micro-fragmentation, in food chain, bird entanglement, clogging drain hazard, unnecessary luxury, waste of petroleum, biodegradable plastic,
    17. Population (the elephant in the room) impact on  environment, limits, emigration as solutions, sterilization, limited family size, family planning, religion’s role,
    18. Public Broadcasting/Freedom of speech/Right to Knowledge Public funded radio and TV, journalistic freedom, freedom of speech, right to full disclosure, artificial news, exposing “False Flag” operations, academic freedom, unattainable higher education, concentration of media in too few hands,
    19. Species (or biodiversity) loss of genetic biodiversity, habitat loss, species decline, declining male fertility, animal extinctions, bee and insect pollination concern, dolphin decline, ethical treatment of animals, amphibian die-off, harvesting of sea turtle eggs for consumption,  established exotic species, Asian carp, zebra mussels, round goby in Great Lakes,
    20. Toxins Hormone mimicking chemicals, estrogens in drinking water, dental amalgam pollution, lead pollution, Minimoto disease, pesticide use, depleted uranium contamination, gasoline additive problems, dioxins, asbestos usage, tritium  filled lighting, herbicides, pressure treated wood, PCB,CFC, PAH, DDT,  thalidomide, growth hormones, 10,000 of 65,000 synthetic chemicals,
    21. Trade and Labor , criminal activity in business, arms trade, flower trade, unfair trade practices, the effect of government subsidies, global monopolies, aquarium trade, unfair trade pacts, temporary farm labor, temporary labor force, labor union rights,
    22. Transportation vehicle emission standards, vehicle mileage standards, public transportation, vehicle excess engine size and HP, impact of leisure drives, weekend getaway impact,
    23. Waste/Recycle  Recycle programs, community recycle programs, waste minimization, electronic waste, exporting of waste, hazardous waste, medical waste, primitive appetite for baubles and beads,
    24. Water Resources (all) fresh water access, salt usage on roads, water softener salt problems, boating pollution, livestock pollution, the Ogallala aquifer depletion, salination of aquifers, salination of rivers, northern waters concerns, oil exploration concerns, rising seas, water tables, water diversions, river dams, bottled water, fresh water standards, acid rain, acid lakes, tritium levels in water, continental shelf marine habitats, fluoride/chlorine in drinking water, aquaculture, coral destruction, coral diseases, algal blooms, propeller scouring, nutrient runoff, car/truck run-off  (lead, oil, tire residue),       sewage discharge, eutrophication of rivers and coastal waters, warming seas,  Great Barrier Reef concerns, shrinking glaciers, changing ocean currents, detergents,
    25. Uncatagorized.

    In this text I have purposely tried to avoid the use of the divisive term Global Warming as it is a of a host of human activities. Addressing some of the other issues noted will impact on this major problem.

    Act Now

    ACT NOW